An Open Letter to Tom Snyder
Dear Tom Snyder,
My recent research on teaching methods in higher education led me to your article, “The Benefits of Online Learning” in the Huffington Post. In your article you express your belief that “the future of higher education lies with online learning” (para 1). I found your article intriguing due to the fact that as technology advances there is a push for smaller interactive classes. You believe the opposite. As I continue to research teaching methods in colleges I have begun to question which is best.
Your article asserts that online learning is the optimal teaching method because it fits the modern lifestyle. You take note of students’s busy schedules when suggesting that online courses are more adaptive. Additionally, you believe that online courses allow institutions to accommodate an increasing student body. You also justify that online courses present a new learning opportunity for those struggling financially, but there are many alternatives to reduce the financial burden.
As members of society, we both want what is best for the nation’s future success. We aspire to present our citizens with the best education possible. I agree that it’s important to find a balance between academic rigors and personal responsibilities. As a current college student, I can identify with your claims due to my firsthand experience with time management. I agree that online courses are a considerable alternative to accommodate both student and institutional needs.
While I do agree that online courses are a teaching alternative to consider, I question whether it is the most ideal. If online courses were widely implemented, do you think that all students would be satisfied? It’s important to take note of those individuals who may not be as tech-savvy but want to learn. They have drive but lack the skill needed for online courses. Also, active members of society need to learn self-motivation and time management skills. By tolerating this lack of skill we are depriving individuals from growth in other, equally important qualities. I do not agree that there will be a time when, “there will be totally virtual colleges and universities” (para 12). Online courses are not necessarily bad, but I believe that certain benefits are only available within a traditional classroom setting.
If there were no traditional classes, students would lose skill in face-to-face human interaction because they are being subject to a technologically driven world. Traditional classroom settings allow students to learn how to collaborate and communicate effectively. Additionally, the lack of traditional university classes would impact the economy. Yes, online courses do create a revenue but it’s not comparable to what a traditional four-year institution brings in.
After reading your article I have recognized how online courses can benefit students, academic institutions and employers. However, I hope you’re willing to consider my reasons and understand why I believe traditional classroom settings must be kept. I am hopeful that our common desire for the growth of our nation will help us reach an accord.
Sincerely,
Karen Alberto